Thorough assessment of the effectiveness of belimumab in a large Spanish multicenter cohort of systemic lupus erythematosus patients.

OBJECTIVES: To provide an overview on the current use of belimumab (BLM) in SLE patients in clinical practice and to examine its efficacy in terms of standardized outcomes, drug survival, as well as patient and safety profiles. METHODS: A longitudinal retrospective multicentre cohort including SLE patients treated with BLM at 18 Spanish centers. Data was collected upon initiation of BLM, at 6 and 12 months after initiation, and at the last recorded visit. Changes in SLEDAI-2K, the proportion of patients who achieved LLDAS and DORIS 2021, and number of flares were compared between visits. Changes in damage, glucocorticoids use and employment status pre-BLM and post-BLM were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 324 patients were included with a mean follow-up of 3.8 (±2.7) years. LLDAS was attained by 45.8%, 62% and 71% of patients, and DORIS by 24%, 36.2% and 52.5% on successive visits, respectively. Twenty-seven-point two percent of patients were in DORIS ≥ 50% of the visits and a 46% in LLDAS-50. Flares and number of flares were significantly lower one year after treatment with BLM and no changes in damage accrual were observed. Mean (±SD) prednisone dose was significantly reduced over time, with 70 (24%) patients discontinuing GC. CONCLUSION: Our study not only demonstrates belimumab´s efficacy in attaining treat-to-target goals in SLE patients, but also confirms its GC-sparing effect, and its prevention of flares and organ damage accrual.

Usefulness of 18F-FDG PET-CT for assessing large-vessel involvement in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis and negative temporal artery biopsy.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the usefulness of 18F-FDG PET-CT for assessing large-vessel (LV) involvement in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis (GCA) and a negative temporal artery biopsy (TAB). METHODS: A retrospective review of our hospital databases was conducted to identify patients with suspected GCA and negative TAB who underwent an 18F-FDG PET-CT in an attempt to confirm the diagnosis. The gold standard for GCA diagnosis was clinical confirmation after a follow-up period of at least 12 months. RESULTS: Out of the 127 patients included in the study, 73 were diagnosed with GCA after a detailed review of their medical records. Of the 73 patients finally diagnosed with GCA, 18F-FDG PET-CT was considered positive in 61 cases (83.5%). Among the 54 patients without GCA, 18F-FDG PET-CT was considered positive in only eight cases (14.8%), which included 1 case of Erdheim-Chester disease, 3 cases of IgG4-related disease, 1 case of sarcoidosis, and 3 cases of isolated aortitis. Overall, the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET-CT for assessing LV involvement in patients finally diagnosed with GCA and negative TAB yielded a sensitivity of 83.5%, specificity of 85.1%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 84% with an area under the ROC curve of 0.844 (95% CI: 0.752 to 0.936). The sensitivity was 89% in occult systemic GCA and 100% in extracranial LV-GCA. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms the utility of 18F-FDG PET-CT in patients presenting with suspected GCA and a negative TAB by demonstrating the presence of LV involvement across different subsets of the disease.

Performance of the new 2022 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for giant cell arteritis in clinical practice in relation to its clinical phenotypes.

BACKGROUND: To examine the performance of the new 2022 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/EULAR classification criteria for giant cell arteritis (GCA) in routine clinical care, compared with the 1990 ACR GCA classification criteria. METHODS: The fulfilment of 2022 ACR/EULAR and 1990 ACR criteria was tested in our real-life cohort of GCA patients with proven vasculitis by temporal artery biopsy or imaging (a necessary pre-requisite to apply the new criteria is the presence of a confirmed diagnosis of medium- or large-vessel vasculitis). The performance of classification criteria was evaluated in all patients with GCA across different subsets of the disease. Patients with GCA were compared with unselected controls with suspected GCA. RESULTS: A total of 136 patients with proven GCA were identified. The new criteria had a sensitivity of 92.6% and a specificity of 85.2%. According to the clinical phenotypes, the sensitivity was 98.8% in cranial GCA, 92% in extracranial large vessel (LV) GCA and 75% in occult systemic GCA. These data are much better than those observed with the 1990 ACR classification criteria, which showed a sensitivity of 66.1% and a specificity of 85.1% for the total sample, with a sensitivity of 89.1% in cranial GCA, 24% in extracranial LV-GCA and 35.7% in occult systemic GCA. Ten (7.4%) patients in our cohort did not fulfil either of the criteria sets (8 with occult systemic GCA and 2 with extracranial LV-GCA). The sensitivity of the new criteria in patients with occult systemic and extracranial LV-GCA could be greatly improved assigning more weight (3 points) to some imaging findings (axillary involvement and FDG-PET activity throughout the aorta). CONCLUSION: Our study confirms that the new classification criteria are more sensitive in real-life settings than the old ACR criteria across all clinical phenotypes.

Efficacy and safety of leflunomide in the management of large vessel vasculitis: A systematic review and metaanalysis of cohort studies.

OBJECTIVE: The search for new glucocorticoid-sparing disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs continues to be an unmet need in large vessel vasculitis (LVV). This report aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of leflunomide (LEF) in Takayasu arteritis (TA) and giant cell arteritis (GCA). METHODS: We systematically reviewed the literature, searching for studies evaluating the efficacy of LEF in LVV. A meta-analysis was conducted using the random-effects method. RESULTS: The literature search identified eight studies that assessed LEF in TAK and seven in GCA. All were uncontrolled observational studies with a high risk of bias, implying a low or very-low certainty of evidence. In TAK, the pooled proportion of patients achieving at least a partial remission was 75% (95% CI: 0.64-0.84), angiographic stabilization was observed in 86% (0.77-0.94) and relapses in 12% (0.05-0.21). The mean reduction in the prednisolone dose (MRPD) after LEF treatment was 15.7 mg/d (10.28-21.16). Adverse events were observed in 8% of patients (0.02-0.16). Comparison of LEF with methotrexate (MTX) or cyclophosphamide revealed LEF to be superior in terms of remission induction, relapse prevention, and tolerance. When compared with tofacitinib, both drugs demonstrated comparable efficacy. In GCA, the pooled proportion of patients achieving at least a partial remission was 60% (0.17-0.95). The MRPD after LEF treatment was 15.63 mg/d (1.29-32.55) and 53% of the patients were able to discontinue glucocorticoids (0.25 - 0.80). Relapses were observed in 21% of cases (0.14- 0.28) and adverse events in 28% (0.12-0.46). Comparison of LEF with MTX showed similar efficacy and tolerance. CONCLUSION: LEF is well tolerated and might be effective for patients with TAK and GCA.